"Given the nature of the conduct by and between the two panies thus far in this case as well as Respondent now questioning the validity of its own statements as explored in the previous paragraph, this Court travels two logical paths to the same conclusion. Either the 12 pages of disclosed incident reports are part of the “withheld 13 pages of documents” as discussed in the March 23, 20 Response or they are not. No matter whether the twelve (12) pages of incident reportss are part of, or separate from, those thirteen (13) withheld pages, the same result occurs: by Respondent’s own declarations, there is at least one extra page that has been withheld from Plaintiff to which Plaintiff has right to receive." "Respondent presents gross misstatement of the facts bordering on fraud against the tribunal and defamatory against the conversationalists while continuing to step on Plaintiff’s constitutional rights and violating the State’s presumption 0f transparency."
"The Court does not find or concede to any of the allegations in Respondent’s Motion. This Court does find that the Respondent’s Counsel‘s antagonism toward the Plaintiff, the Court and its staff, as well as misstating the standards in judicial and legal conduct, has created cyst within this case that taints the judicial process and thus threatens impartiality."
0 Comments